Siter.io

What Siter.io is

Siter.io is a no-code website builder for designers, freelancers and small teams who want control over how a site looks without writing code. Its own tagline is "No-code website builder for humans", and it adds that these are "Websites designed by people, not generated from a prompt." You draw the site in Figma or on the editor's canvas, fine-tune the details and publish it. Siter's comparison pages place it alongside Readymag, as a design tool that publishes, rather than with template builders.

What you build and how

The editor works like a design canvas rather than a form. You position elements freehand, organize them in groups and layers, and lock, hide or move them as the design changes. The site's pitch is the same editor tools and shortcuts you already know from design software. A comparison page on the site describes the product as having "a canvas, breakpoints and a Figma step", which tells you the workflow: you design for each screen size and you can bring the design in from Figma.

The Figma plugin is the headline integration. The site says you can import Figma designs and transform them into websites without coding. One reviewer quoted on the homepage says the plugin "saves me hours of hard work with a developer", and another calls it new and says it makes the process faster and more straightforward. A quoted reviewer also writes that the platform gives "full control over how your site appears on desktop and mobile" and is "responsive from the box".

Animation is built into the editor. You can select a preset or design your own animation style for any element and choose the trigger type. An "Insert a code" feature lets you add custom code into a design. SVG editing lets you change the colors and shapes of uploaded vector graphics or draw one yourself using curves. Siter's comparison with Readymag says you can upload your own font files, though it admits the box of ready-made parts is smaller than Readymag's widget set.

Collaboration is part of the pitch. The homepage describes inviting copywriters, designers and other creatives to craft a site together, with the example of one person writing the copy while another picks the colors.

Publishing works through paid plans. Each plan lists the number of published websites, a page allowance and a custom domain. The free plan, labeled Start Free, is for building and previewing: its comparison table says it builds and previews privately and does not publish a public site.

Be clear about what is missing, because Siter's own comparison pages are. The page comparing it with Carrd says there is no CMS, collections or blog, and that Siter has none of them any more than Carrd does. E-commerce is listed as upcoming, with no date. Code export is described as limited. Password protection is marked "not documented" on its comparison with Readymag, and version history is documented only at a coarser level than Readymag's per-project counts. The site says "Not documented" means it could not confirm the feature from a primary source and would rather leave a cell empty than guess.

Evidence from the pages

Pricing comes from Siter's own pricing summary, which its comparison pages say was checked on 2026-09-03. Here is what the plan cards list.

• Start: free, private previews only, no public publishing, 10 pages.
• Solo: $7 a month billed yearly or $8 monthly, 1 published website, 10 pages, custom domain included.
• Plus: $12 a month billed yearly or $14 monthly, 3 published websites, 50 pages, custom domain included.
• Pro: $24 a month, 5 published websites, as stated on the Carrd comparison page.

The company says it prices per account rather than per site, which only matters above one site: Plus publishes 3 sites and Pro publishes 5. The Readymag comparison also says that Siter's monthly traffic allowance is "Not metered", whereas Readymag caps views per month across all published sites, at 10,000 on Personal, 25,000 on Freelancer and 75,000 on Advanced. That is Siter's own description of a competitor, read from Readymag's EU price sheet in euros, so treat it as the vendor's comparison and not an independent test.

The same pages are candid about price. Against Carrd, whose entry tier that publishes to a custom domain is $19 a year on Pro Standard, Siter's Solo works out at $84 a year, and the page says plainly "There is no version of this where we are the cheap option." Carrd's free plan publishes three live one-page sites, which Siter's free plan does not. That frankness is useful to a buyer.

Feedback is on the homepage as quoted user reviews. One writes that it is "a multi-layered product that allows you to go as deep as you wish as UI and UX designer" and that simple sites were designed and released in a day. Another says it is "so much more intuitive than other web builders, especially for designers and people used to tools like Figma." A third describes the support team guiding them through a custom domain step by step. One reviewer calls it "a young product" with a dedicated team. These are testimonials the site chose to print, not independent ratings.

The pages state no customer count, no compliance certifications and no company location, and the pages we hold do not list integrations beyond Figma.

Who it suits and who it does not

Siter.io suits a designer or design-trained freelancer who already thinks in layers and frames and wants a published site that matches the design exactly. It also suits an agency or freelancer with several client sites, because Plus covers 3 published sites under one account and each paid plan includes a custom domain. A designer who wants the Figma file to become the site will find the plugin the most direct route on the page.

It is a weaker match for a few buyers. Anyone who needs a blog, collections or a store should look elsewhere for now, since the company lists no CMS and puts e-commerce as upcoming. Someone who just wants one cheap link page would do better with the budget tool Siter itself points to, and the company says as much. The free plan cannot publish, so you pay before anything goes live. The comparison pages also note that Siter asks you to bring a design, and that having a canvas and breakpoints means more product to absorb than a simple settings panel. If you want to take the built site with you as code, the pages call export limited.