Kipps AI

What Kipps AI is

Kipps AI is an AI agent platform for building voice, chat, and WhatsApp agents that talk to customers and prospects. Its home page promises agents that "handle millions of conversations with human-like intelligence". It is aimed at sales, support, and appointment-heavy businesses, and at agencies that want to run conversational agents for clients. The parent company is Derived Mind Technologies Private Limited, based in Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Because one product covers both chatbots and phone agents, it sits in two places in this directory: chatbot builders and voice AI agent builders. The sections below cover both sides of it.

What you build and how

The product line on the site has 3 parts: a Voice AI Agent, a Chat AI Agent, and an Inbox. The company also announces a WhatsApp Flow Agent, described as "a visual drag-and-drop Conversational Builder on WhatsApp". That is the pages' one description of a visual editor. They do not describe the editor for the voice and chat agents, so this entry does not either.

The voice side is the most developed part of the pitch. The home page lets a visitor type a name and phone number and receive a demo call from a Kipps voice agent, with no sign-up required. The text next to it says the same agent "engages prospects, qualifies leads, and handles real conversations", and lists human-like conversation quality, real-time answers, handling objections, and qualifying and booking appointments. 3 sample calls are published: an EdTech lead qualification call that qualifies leads against your criteria and schedules demos, a hotel receptionist that books rooms and answers questions about amenities, services, and billing, and a hospital sales representative that books appointments and manages inquiries.

Voice features named in the site footer are call forwarding, inbound calls, and support for Cal.com, a scheduling tool. The voice agent can take inbound calls, and the demo call shows it phoning a prospect. The industries listed are real estate, healthcare, and financial services.

On the chat side, the company sells a Chat AI Agent alongside the WhatsApp agents. Its own comparison post describes Kipps as the better fit for agencies offering chat, voice, and WhatsApp together, with the same credits spent across channels.

Integrations are a plain claim on the home page: "50+ Integrations Ready", with custom integrations available through an API. The only named ones in the footer are Zapier automations and Cal.com. The site also lists secure webhook delivery with signatures among its security features.

On the model side, one of the company's posts says Kipps supports multiple LLMs, with multilingual capability including Arabic through models such as GPT 4o and Gemini 2.5. So the language coverage depends on which model sits behind an agent, and you are choosing among hosted models, not running your own.

The pages do not mention code export, self-hosting, a custom domain for the chat widget, or an iOS or Android SDK. Treat all of those as unknown rather than absent.

What the pages say about plans, scale, and trust

Kipps publishes its plan details inside its own comparison posts, and the figures differ a little between posts, so they are best read as illustrations.

• A free plan exists. The company's Ringg AI comparison says to "Start with Kipps AI's free plan" and gives it 100 monthly credits, with no credit card required and cancel anytime. The home page calls to action read "Start For Free" and "Sign Up for Free".
• The next named plan is Scale, at $59/month, according to the same post.
• Enterprise is custom. That post says Kipps offers flexible enterprise contracts and sends you to sales for pricing, and at 100,000 minutes a month it estimates $0.06-$0.08 per minute, which it totals at $6,000-$8,000 a month.
• Usage is metered in credits. The Awaz AI comparison puts a voice minute at about $0.13, worked out as 12 credits at $0.011 each. The Ringg AI comparison instead uses 7.8 credits per minute at a bulk rate of about $0.011 a credit, so 10,000 minutes is 78,000 credits and $858 a month, or $0.086 a minute. Credits per minute therefore depend on the setup and the post you read, so ask before you budget a campaign.
• Credits never expire. Unused credits roll over from one month to the next, which the Awaz post pitches for seasonal businesses.

Both comparison posts are published by Kipps, and the Awaz one says so in a disclosure: it states that pricing was collected from public pricing pages as of February 2026. They are the company's own view of its competitors, not neutral tests.

The home page also publishes scale claims. It says "Trusted by 50+ Companies Worldwide", elsewhere "500+ businesses already use Kipps AI", and shows 10M+ conversations, 99.9% uptime, 50ms response time, and 50+ enterprise clients. These are the company's numbers, presented without a methodology. A testimonial block quotes Achin Agarwal, CTO and co-founder at Acquafront Infrastructure, saying the chat agent improved website retention, next to figures of 60% cost reduction, 90% faster response time, and a 4.9/5 CSAT score.

Security claims are a short list: role-based access controls, API rate limiting and DDoS protection, secure webhook delivery with signatures, advanced threat detection and monitoring, and regular security audits and penetration testing. The page also says "Trusted by Fortune 500 Companies". It names no compliance standard, so a team that needs a named certification has to ask the company directly.

Who it suits and who it does not

Kipps suits a small sales or support team that wants to try an AI caller or WhatsApp agent without a procurement cycle. The free plan with 100 credits is enough to hear how the voice agent sounds on your own use case, and the demo call on the home page lets you do that before signing up. It also suits an agency that wants one platform for voice, chat, and WhatsApp clients, which is how its own comparison post pitches it.

It is a weaker fit for a team that needs published plan tables to approve a budget: the numbers above come from blog posts and they conflict on credits per minute. It also does not suit anyone who needs code export, self-hosting, or a stated compliance certification, since none of the three appears on the pages. The company's own Ringg comparison says Ringg "edges ahead for regulated industries requiring strict compliance", which is a fair signal of where Kipps is less proven. One more caveat is that the free plan is described as a way to test the platform, so plan on a paid tier for real call volume.